[PLUG] http://badvista.fsf.org

[BVK]

On 4/20/07, A G <subscrive at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> I only hope that fsf does not do harm to OSS with
> SCOish arguments and claims.

What arguments? what claims?  Can you enlight us with any?  Your
comparision of FSF with SCO tells us a *lot* about your knowledge on
these topics.

FYI, all FSF owned software is licensed under "GPL v2 (or later)".
That means, if all *your* OSS fellows decide FSF is a shit, you can
simply fork of all FSF software and maintain it on www.opensource.org.
 You can live as if FSF and GPLv3 never exists.  Nobody can stop you
and all the best!


/ bvk-chaitanya