[PLUG] What topics are allowed ?

[Skool!lookS•InkarNatioN]

"M & arch".

Arch of "St. Louis"

:-)

⁣⁣BlueMail-ing Using a 10.or Device​

Get BlueMail for Android ​

On 16 Feb 2019, 16:07, at 16:07, "Skool!lookS•InkarNatioN" <look.kool at guruvision.com> wrote:
>"March" s just round the corner "now".
>
>
>
>⁣⁣BlueMail-ing Using a 10.or Device​
>
>Get BlueMail for Android ​
>
>On 16 Feb 2019, 16:05, at 16:05, "Skool!lookS•InkarNatioN"
><look.kool at guruvision.com> wrote:
>>How is this discussion related to Linux/OSS?
>>
>>Why does it not get discussed elsewhere?
>>
>>Enjoy..
>>
>>Life is about taxing yourself/others . . .
>>
>>Choice rests with governance (not pundits) . . !
>>
>>⁣⁣BlueMail-ing Using a 10.or Device​
>>
>>Get BlueMail for Android ​
>>
>>On 15 Feb 2019, 12:34, at 12:34, Mayuresh <mayuresh at acm.org> wrote:
>>>On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 12:18:23PM +0530, Mandar Vaze / मंदार वझे
>>>wrote:
>>>> Sudhanwa, Gaurav and/or other "admins" :
>>>>
>>>> Why do we allow/tolerate "certain individuals" to post "rants"
>>>unrelated to
>>>> linux/OSS ?
>>>>
>>>> I tried to ignore such emails for a long time, but then more
>>>"obscure"
>>>> emails started coming in (and more frequently)
>>>>
>>>> I refuse to reply to such individuals because most likely I will
>get
>>>a
>>>> response, which won't make sense (at all), Also I remembered a
>>saying
>>>that
>>>> "If you wrestle a pig, you'll get dirty and pig will enjoy (and pig
>>>will
>>>> win due to practice)"
>>>
>>>I share the sentiment. I am also a long term member of this list (for
>>>18/19 years). The quality of posts of late has been poor.
>>>
>>>I once wrote individually to some of the people you have addressed
>>>above.
>>>
>>>Since there appears to be no institutional mechanism (or any
>>discussion
>>>thereon) to shun the nuisance I just did the best I could
>>individually:
>>>If
>>>I notice habitual obscure/non sense senders, I block them in my
>>>mailbox.
>>>(To be precise, I use procmail to redirect such senders' "stuff" to
>>>/dev/null).
>>>
>>>Moderation could be one solution (though I know it was once done away
>>>with
>>>after such demand). I do not know what other best practices exist for
>>>this.
>>>
>>>Mayuresh
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>plug-mail mailing list
>>>plug-mail at plug.org.in
>>>http://list.plug.org.in/listinfo/plug-mail
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.plug.org.in/pipermail/plug-mail/attachments/20190216/ae2580ab/attachment-0001.html>