[PLUG] What are the Fedora 9 codename candidates?

[Rahul Sundaram]

Pranav Peshwe wrote:
> On a serious note, what is the objective in having a 'codename' ? For an
> unnamed product, it might seem logical to have some name initially, for
> internal addressing. But, could not get the point in searching for a
> codename for 'Fedora 9' ?
> Any explanation would be welcome.

There isn't any big functional objectives. It is just part of the fun 
for those involved.

Rahul